Last updated: July 2026
Why is there a clothes graveyard in the Atacama Desert? Chile imports huge volumes of secondhand and unsold clothing through the Iquique free trade zone. Garments that cannot be resold, an estimated 39,000 to 40,000 tons a year, are trucked into the desert near Alto Hospicio and dumped or burned, creating one of the world’s most visible fast fashion waste sites.
How Did Cheap Trends Create a Desert Full of Clothes?
Today’s consumerist culture demands thousands of new garments every single day. We have been sold the idea that staying fashionable requires constantly renewing our wardrobes, trend after trend, haul after haul. The question we rarely ask is where all of these clothes go when we are done with them, and what happens when consumers move on from trends faster than brands can anticipate, leaving mountains of overproduction behind.
Between 2000 and 2014, garment lifespans were cut roughly in half while global clothing production doubled, and customers increased their purchases by around 60 percent. As garments became cheaper and trend cycles accelerated, brands began producing far more clothing than the market could realistically absorb. Fast production models were never designed to match supply with actual demand. They were designed to flood customers with options, banking on volume over longevity.
It is no surprise, then, that a large share of all clothing ends up in landfills or incinerators within a year of being produced. On top of that, the Ellen MacArthur Foundation estimates that around 12 percent of the material used in production is lost before it even becomes a garment. This leaves us with textile waste as a global problem with serious environmental and public health consequences.
That global overflow becomes painfully visible in the Atacama Desert, where an estimated 40,000 tons of discarded clothing, much of it sourced from European and American channels, arrive every year. Massive dumps of clothes leach dyes and chemicals into the soil, while part of the waste is burned, dispersing pollutants that degrade air quality and threaten respiratory health in nearby communities.
Why Do So Many Clothes End Up in Chile Specifically?
Chile is one of the largest importers of secondhand clothing in South America. Bales of used and unsold garments enter through the free trade zone at Iquique, where traders sort them for resale across Chile and neighboring countries. A significant share of each bale is unsellable, and because formal disposal is costly and municipal landfills refuse textile loads, the leftovers have for years been dumped or burned in the desert outside Alto Hospicio.
The Atacama’s dry climate preserves what arrives. Synthetic garments made largely of polyester do not biodegrade on any human timescale, so the piles simply accumulate, visible even in satellite imagery. The dump is not an accident of geography. It is the end point of a global supply chain that produces more clothing than anyone can wear and exports the surplus to countries with fewer resources to manage it.
Who Is Working to Reverse the Damage on the Ground?
For years, media and consumers worldwide ignored this staggering illegal landfill. In 2021, everything changed. Photographs taken by Martin Bernetti and published by Agence France-Presse circulated widely, giving the crisis a social media presence and international recognition. That attention showcased the work of younger generations in Chile, who had already been leading initiatives to reduce textile waste and promote circularity.
An important example is Desierto Vestido, an NGO with the mission to educate, raise awareness and promote the circular economy in the textile industry through talks, workshops and desert clean up operations.
Rosario Hevia has also had a notable impact. She began with a small project focused on reusing children’s clothes and later opened Ecocitex in 2019. The company produces textile goods from yarn made entirely of damaged or discarded garments, in a process that requires no water or chemical treatments, making it one of the most genuinely circular models in the region.
Another striking private effort is Atacama RE-commerce, launched in March 2025. Garments dumped in the Atacama, many of them brand new with tags or barely worn, are recovered, cleaned, restored and offered online for free, with customers paying only shipping. In other words, you pay to pull a piece of clothing out of the desert. Every rescued piece becomes a reminder of the system that put it there, and a small step toward a future where clothes are valued rather than tossed aside.
Can Anyone Be Held Legally Responsible for the Dumping?
Civilians did not just innovate their way around the crisis; they took the issue to court. In 2022, Paulin Silva, a Chilean lawyer, filed a lawsuit against the state of Chile alleging responsibility for the massive textile landfills in Alto Hospicio.
The case finally raised the fundamental question of who can be held accountable for the damage. According to the ruling issued in September 2025, the State bears a significant role in allowing the crisis to unfold. The court ordered the government to prepare a remediation plan within six months. The State appealed the decision, and as of mid 2026 the ruling is not yet final and the case remains unresolved. Whatever the final outcome, the litigation has already shifted the conversation from individual consumer guilt toward institutional responsibility.
What Is Chile Doing About Textile Waste Under Its EPR Law?
Even while contesting legal responsibility in court, Chilean policymakers have moved toward regulating the textiles entering the country. Chile’s framework law on waste management and extended producer responsibility, known as the REP law, has been in force since 2016 and already covers products such as packaging, tires and electronics. In 2025, the government introduced a comprehensive national circular economy strategy for textiles and named the eradication of illegal textile dumps one of its central goals.
The strategy marked a turning point. For the first time, textiles were formally recognized as a priority product, the legal step that brings a waste stream under the REP framework. In practice, this means importers and brands will be required to track the garments they bring into the country, report volumes, and finance systems for collection, reuse and recycling. Detailed targets are still being developed, with the government aiming to have binding collection and recovery goals in place toward the end of the decade. For a deeper explanation of how the Chilean scheme is being designed, the Ellen MacArthur Foundation has published a useful explainer on EPR for textiles in Chile.
The strategy also seeks to strengthen Chile’s growing circular economy. By supporting repair centers, upcycling initiatives and textile recyclers, and by including them as recipients of EPR funding, policymakers aim to slow the constant arrival of garments into informal dumps while creating sustainable employment. The government has recognized that EPR can deliver social benefits by formalizing the work of informal waste pickers and securing fair conditions for them. Chilean officials also acknowledge that organizing textile waste is only part of the solution, since the problem arises from cultural and commercial forces that drive both overproduction and overconsumption.
How Does the EU’s Textile EPR Push Compare?
Chile is not acting alone. The European Union, one of the main sources of the clothing that ends up in the Atacama, agreed in 2025 on a revision of its Waste Framework Directive that makes extended producer responsibility for textiles mandatory across all member states. Producers selling clothing in the EU, including online sellers based outside the bloc, will have to fund the collection, sorting and recycling of textiles, with fees modulated so that longer lasting garments pay less. Member states have a transition period of roughly two and a half years after the revised directive entered into force to set up their national schemes, so as of mid 2026 most countries are still building them, with France’s longstanding scheme serving as the working model.
The EU is also attacking overproduction directly. Under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation, which entered into force in 2024, a ban on the destruction of unsold apparel and footwear begins applying to large companies in July 2026, with medium sized companies following after a transition period. Together, these measures target the same dynamic that fills the Atacama: garments produced in volumes no market can absorb.
| Region and law | What it requires | Status as of mid 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Chile, REP law (Law 20.920) extended to textiles | Importers and brands must register, report volumes and fund collection, reuse and recycling of textiles | Textiles named a priority product in the 2025 strategy; detailed targets under development, expected before 2030 |
| EU, revised Waste Framework Directive | Mandatory textile EPR schemes in every member state, with fees based on product durability | Agreed and adopted in 2025; member states setting up national schemes within the transition period |
| EU, Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) | Ban on destroying unsold clothing and footwear, plus durability and disclosure rules | In force since 2024; destruction ban applies to large companies from July 2026 |
| France, AGEC framework | Longest running textile EPR scheme, financing collection and repair funds | Operational; used as the reference model for the EU wide rollout |
What Does the Atacama Tell Us About Fashion’s Future?
The Atacama serves as a global case study of what happens when overproduction and weak regulation collide. The desert exposes the true cost of a fashion system driven by speed, excess and profit built on volume, but it also highlights the rise of young innovators and growing legal pressure demanding systemic change.
Chile’s emerging policies, together with the EU’s regulatory turn, now serve as a blueprint for other nations facing similar crises. No single policy will erase the contamination overnight, and enforcement will decide whether these laws change outcomes on the ground. Still, the direction is unmistakable: a future marked by circularity, transparency and producer accountability. The Atacama Desert stands as both a warning and a compass, reminding us that fashion’s future depends not only on what we create, but on what we refuse to waste.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where exactly is the clothes graveyard in the Atacama Desert?
The main dumping grounds sit outside Alto Hospicio, a municipality near the port city of Iquique in northern Chile, close to the free trade zone through which most secondhand clothing enters the country.
How much clothing is dumped in the Atacama each year?
Estimates commonly cited by researchers and local organizations put the figure at roughly 39,000 to 40,000 tons of discarded textiles per year, a share of the far larger volume of used clothing imported through Iquique.
What is extended producer responsibility (EPR) for textiles?
EPR is a legal principle that makes producers financially and operationally responsible for their products at end of life. For textiles, that means brands and importers must fund collection, sorting, reuse and recycling instead of leaving the cost to municipalities and communities.
Has Chile’s textile EPR scheme taken effect yet?
Not fully. As of mid 2026, textiles have been designated a priority product under Chile’s REP law and a national strategy is in place, but the detailed decree setting binding collection and recycling targets is still being developed.
Will EU rules actually reduce dumping in places like the Atacama?
They can help. Mandatory EPR fees and the ban on destroying unsold goods raise the cost of overproduction, and the EU is also moving to tighten rules on exporting textile waste disguised as secondhand clothing. Enforcement, both in Europe and at receiving ports, will determine the real impact.
References
- Bartlett, J. (2025, June 26). Chile targets fast fashion waste with landmark desert cleanup plan. The Guardian.
- Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2017). A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion’s future.
- Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2024). EPR for textiles in Chile.
- European Commission. Waste Framework Directive and Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation resources.
- FRANCE 24. (2021, November 8). Chile’s desert dumping ground for fast fashion leftovers.
- Ministry of the Environment, Chile. (2025). Textiles, circular economy strategy.
- Ordenez, J. (2024, February 22). De quien es la culpa? La demanda contra Chile por los basurales de ropa en el desierto. La Tercera.
- Re-commerce Atacama. Our suppliers.
- United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2018, July 12). UN Alliance aims to put fashion on path to sustainability.
Author: Viviana Sofia Chavarria Medrano
Viviana is a law student at the University of Costa Rica (UCR). She is passionate about fashion law and human rights, and how these two fields connect through the legal promotion and oversight of sustainable production in the fashion industry. She loves books, learning, hiking, tennis, and, above all, fashion design.
FASHION LAW JOURNAL INSIDER
Join designers, brand founders and fashion lawyers who get the biggest brand battles, IP fights and career moves in fashion law, straight to their inbox.
Amazing article!
This is such an important topic to keep speaking about because it affects us all. I believe that sometimes that’s where the problem begins, because we think that if it doesn’t cause us any harm directly, it doesn’t matter. But I believe that we have more power as a collective, proposing solutions and remembering that we only have one planet Earth and that we have crucial roles into making it a better and healthier place to live.
On the other hand, I loved how the author showcases how the people in Chile are moving together for a cause that should make every one of us concerned.
I believe we should look at Chile’s example, look into our communities, and check if anything like that is happening. That way, we can propose solutions and move towards a better and less polluted future for all.
Few times in life do we have the privilege of encountering someone as remarkable as Viviana. Speaking with her feels like stepping into a kind of Narnia for intellectuals—a place where ideas come alive, critical thinking becomes an adventure, and dialogue turns into profound learning.
Her passion for human rights reminds us, with both strength and sensitivity, that in the world we live in, the human being must remain at the center of each and every public policy. In times when numbers, interests, and circumstances often take precedence, she firmly insists on placing human dignity as both the guiding principle and the ultimate purpose.
I am deeply proud to see Viviana grow—strong and steadfast like a cypress tree—contributing with conviction, scholarship, and character to the Western legal world. Her voice does not merely enrich the debate; it elevates it. Her work does not simply add value; it transforms.
Without a doubt, Viviana is one of those rare individuals who leave a lasting mark—not only for what they know, but for who they are.