Paris, Milan and New York: Why Fashion Needs International IP Protection

Milan

Fashion operates globally before a piece of clothing is even available to a consumer. For instance, a dress could be conceived in Paris, produced through a supply chain in Milan and then displayed worldwide in New York and sold online. However, the legal protections for that garment are often limited by national jurisdictions.

This is a difficult situation: fashion is not restricted by borders, but intellectual property rights are mostly limited to a few territories.

Fashion hubs in Paris, Milan, and New York illustrate this problem. Not only do they represent international markets, but they are also distinct legal frameworks that designers have to navigate in order to maintain their creativity, brands, and commercial identity.

The legal value behind a runway

Fashion collections can include a lot of intellectual property at the same time. Designers’ sketches and unique textile designs, for example, may be protected by copyright laws. A garment’s or accessory’s look could be protected by industrial-design laws, and a brand’s name, logo, or other distinctive sign might be registered as a trademark.

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) explicitly acknowledges that the fashion industry allows for the coexistence of copyrights, industrial designs, trademarks, and patents.

Internationally, a strong legal framework exists. The Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property deals with industrial property issues such as trademarks, industrial designs, trade names, and unfair competition. In addition, the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement requires WTO members to protect new or original industrial designs and to protect owners from unauthorised commercial copying.

Paris: where heritage meets brand protection

Paris is the heartbeat of fashion and the commercial might of the industry. For luxury brands, names, logos, and special branding are among their most cherished assets.

That’s where trademark law comes in as a key player. Under Article 15 of TRIPS, any sign that distinguishes one company’s goods or services from another’s can be protected under trademark law.

International registration options can simplify this process. The Madrid System by WIPO allows trademark holders to secure protection across various countries through a single centralized registration system.

So for a fashion house from Paris targeting New York or Milan, trademark protection goes beyond just preventing others from using their logo. It’s all about protecting the brand’s commercial identity and consumer recognition.

Milan: protecting the design itself

Milan has a different angle on the issue: how important looks are in the fashion world.

Article 25 of TRIPS talks about the need to protect unique industrial designs that are new or original, and Article 26 gives rights against commercial use of designs that have been copied or closely imitated.

In fashion, that is even more important, as trends change very quickly. A designer might invest months designing a silhouette, handbag, shoe, or fabric design only to see that the same is already on sale somewhere else.

The Hague System, run by WIPO, provides international protection for industrial designs from various countries with just one application. WIPO cites clothing, accessories, shoes, and fabric patterns as fashion-related designs that can take advantage of this system.

New York: where copyright meets the limits of fashion law

New York has a pretty hard question. Is fashion design art or something purely functional?

In the U.S., copyright law tends to regard clothing as a “useful article”. This means the practical side of clothes generally does not come under copyright protection,  but the artistic elements, such as unique fabric designs, patterns, or decorative touches, do.

This difference is one reason why relying solely on one type of intellectual property protection can be a risk for fashion brands operating worldwide.

So designers might want to take a mixed approach: copyright for any artistic elements that qualify, seek design protection for the look of their products when possible, secure trademarks for their brand identity, and consider patents for real technical innovations.

The real problem: a borderless counterfeit market

The internet has really ramped up the urgency of this issue. A design that is presented at Paris Fashion Week can be snapped, copied and put up for sale online to customers in different countries in just a few days.

According to the European Commission’s IP Helpdesk, counterfeiting, imitation products and unfair competition are major problems for fashion businesses. That’s why they stress the need to integrate trademarks, designs, and copyright into a strong intellectual property (IP) strategy.

So international IP protection is not just about lawsuits. It supports designers’ growth by helping them attract investor funding, license their work, enter new markets, and protect the value of what they do. WIPO also notes that IP is a key ingredient in the whole ecosystem of licensing, collaboration and merchandising in fashion.

One runway, many jurisdictions

Paris, Milan, and New York may have a perpetual struggle for cultural supremacy, but when it comes to intellectual property, they all share a common truth: fashion knows no boundaries, which means fashion law can’t just be seen as local regulations.

There isn’t a single global law governing fashion. Instead, the Paris Convention, TRIPS, the Madrid System, and the Hague System allow designers and fashion companies to secure their rights in their own countries so they can do so abroad as well.

In the end, today’s fashion lawyer isn’t just protecting a dress or a handbag or even a logo. They’re defending the legal backbone of an international creative enterprise.

FASHION LAW JOURNAL INSIDER

Join designers, brand founders and fashion lawyers who get the biggest brand battles, IP fights and career moves in fashion law, straight to their inbox.

Larikupar Lyngdoh Nongbri

Larikupar Lyngdoh Nongbri is an LL.M. graduate who views law not merely as a set of rules, but as a driving force that moves with society. His intellectual interests traverse Intellectual Property Rights, Environmental Law, Criminal Law, Cyber Law, Contract Law and Administrative Law. Fascinated by the questions that arise where law meets real-world change, he approaches legal research with curiosity, critical thinking, and a desire to look beyond conventional interpretations. His work reflects a growing interest in contemporary legal challenges and the role of law in shaping a more secure, innovative, and sustainable society.

Fashion house
Previous Story

What Makes a Fashion House? Couture Rules and Legal Structure

Don't Miss

Dandyism

Dandyism: History of the English Dandyman 

The Georgian Era brought a rich cultural history, societal shifts,…